<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fortune Magazine runs featured story on CNN about increasing dotMobi popularity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oregonpublishing.com/blog/fortune-magazine-runs-featured-story-on-cnn-about-increasing-dotmobi-popularity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oregonpublishing.com/blog/fortune-magazine-runs-featured-story-on-cnn-about-increasing-dotmobi-popularity/</link>
	<description>Internet Tech Talk, Tools, and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 23:46:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus A.</title>
		<link>http://www.oregonpublishing.com/blog/fortune-magazine-runs-featured-story-on-cnn-about-increasing-dotmobi-popularity/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregonpublishing.com/blog/?p=25#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Wow - there are a lot of people backing this. But I guess the next question is one of speed: will mobile technology evolve fast enough that it will render made-for-mobile sites superfluous or will the demand for made-for-mobile sites come before we are even near that level.

Anyway - the talk has got me excited - I just registered my first two .mobis :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8211; there are a lot of people backing this. But I guess the next question is one of speed: will mobile technology evolve fast enough that it will render made-for-mobile sites superfluous or will the demand for made-for-mobile sites come before we are even near that level.</p>
<p>Anyway &#8211; the talk has got me excited &#8211; I just registered my first two .mobis <img src='http://www.oregonpublishing.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.oregonpublishing.com/blog/fortune-magazine-runs-featured-story-on-cnn-about-increasing-dotmobi-popularity/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 19:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregonpublishing.com/blog/?p=25#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still torn like many in the industry about the value and future use of .mobi IS it All Hype or has it got BITE?

Marcus, I think it is little more than &quot;enough hype&quot; when you see who is backing  .mobi
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.mobi#Sponsors_of_.mobi

And to keep pace with what and whom is developing their .mobi sites ve sure to check out: http://www.developing.mobi/

Makes me wonder if .mobi in the future will wrap itself up in Net Neutrality:  the different boosts in speeds depending on how you access the Internet.
I feel there are just to many BIG BOYS involved for a &quot;Hoax&quot; to be real.

I&#039;m still on the fence, but lean toward .mobi rather than away.  I only own one .mobi  A single dictionary keyword. I&#039;m waiting to see like the rest of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still torn like many in the industry about the value and future use of .mobi IS it All Hype or has it got BITE?</p>
<p>Marcus, I think it is little more than &#8220;enough hype&#8221; when you see who is backing  .mobi<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.mobi#Sponsors_of_.mobi" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.mobi#Sponsors_of_.mobi</a></p>
<p>And to keep pace with what and whom is developing their .mobi sites ve sure to check out: <a href="http://www.developing.mobi/" rel="nofollow">http://www.developing.mobi/</a></p>
<p>Makes me wonder if .mobi in the future will wrap itself up in Net Neutrality:  the different boosts in speeds depending on how you access the Internet.<br />
I feel there are just to many BIG BOYS involved for a &#8220;Hoax&#8221; to be real.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still on the fence, but lean toward .mobi rather than away.  I only own one .mobi  A single dictionary keyword. I&#8217;m waiting to see like the rest of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus A.</title>
		<link>http://www.oregonpublishing.com/blog/fortune-magazine-runs-featured-story-on-cnn-about-increasing-dotmobi-popularity/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 21:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregonpublishing.com/blog/?p=25#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Funny that it&#039;s .mobi. Could have been .cell or anything else. Any any dot-com that really wants to cater to a cellphone market would probably be better off doing a mobile.sitename.com for mobile browsers.

But then again, if there is enough hype people will see value in anything :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny that it&#8217;s .mobi. Could have been .cell or anything else. Any any dot-com that really wants to cater to a cellphone market would probably be better off doing a mobile.sitename.com for mobile browsers.</p>
<p>But then again, if there is enough hype people will see value in anything <img src='http://www.oregonpublishing.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

